Campaigners say community has been ignored over Valley Gardens plans

Residents and business owners say something has gone ‘seriously wrong’ with the third phase plans for Valley Gardens.
Option One Valley GardensOption One Valley Gardens
Option One Valley Gardens

The Valley Gardens Forum is set to criticise both the scheme and consultation in a deputation to a special meeting of Brighton and Hove City Council’s environment, transport and sustainability committee on Thursday (February 7).

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The business case for the £7 million scheme to change the road layout at the Aquarium roundabout and Old Steine was approved in November as the third phase of a project to simplify the road layout.

Thursday’s meeting is to note the results of the consultation that took place the end of last year and approve the final design.

Forum members, a group formed in January of residents, businesses and organisations in the city centre, say the council has ‘ignored’ the community.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The deputation says: “Our diverse and lively group is exactly the kind of sounding board the relevant local councillors should want to encourage and engage with at the earliest stages of re-imagining our critical infrastructure in the city.

“Yet somehow, something has gone seriously wrong with Valley Gardens.

“Everyone I’ve listed around the community feels marginalised and ignored.

“Even if the current plans were outstandingly good; the seismic shift in direction which the project has taken in the last three months, the perceived arrogance displayed by the administration, officer and consultants alike and a feeling we are being ‘steamrollered’ is baffling.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The group is concerned about air quality on the east side of Old Steine and suggests a park and ride scheme would be a better solution to stopping people driving into the city centre.

It also raises the issue of the impact on events space in the city centre, as does Brighton Fringe CEO Julian Caddy who is one of nine people submitting questions to the committee.

He points out the business case says the plans improve event space, but he believes large and mid-scale space is compromised.

In his question to the committee he said: “New, often smaller, events sites are created without adequate consultation, while existing ones (Victoria Gardens, St Peter’s Church North and Old Steine) are either left unimproved or rendered unsuitable for future use.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“What assurance can the committee give that fit-for-purpose space will indeed increase within current plans?”

Two questions going before the committee relate to replacing the Aquarium roundabout at the Palace Pier with a light-controlled T junction.

David Rochford of the Brighton Pier Company is asking why the consultants prefer lights to a roundabout.

His question states: “It is universally accepted that roundabouts are safer than traditional signal-controlled stops.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Roundabouts reduced injury crashes by 75 per cent at and around intersections where traffic lights were previously used.

“As well as being safer calmer and improving traffic flow, they are also cheaper to install and maintain than T junctions.”

Beatrice Segura Harvey, of Brighton Language College is also asking for clarity about the junction’s safety record.

Her questions says: “BHCC reports the number of accidents in this area but numbers in relation to volume of traffic are actually low.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“It is widely believed that the only most serious injury encountered by a pedestrian in proximity to the Aquarium Roundabout in the last five years was caused by a collision between a cyclist and a pedestrian.”

The public consultation taking place from October to the end of November, saw 828 people respond.

A total of 1,396 postcards were sent out to people living in the area, but only 16 people who participated said they saw one of these.