Hard done by – why Steyning Town were seething after Sussex Cup semi loss to Horsham

Steyning Town’s historic Sussex Senior Cup semi-final ended in disappointment with a 4-1 defeat to Horsham FC at Lancing FC – in a game which was marred by a controversial red card in the first half.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Trailing 2-1 at half-time time and down to 10 men, the Barrowmen faced an uphill battle in the second half and Horsham in the end ran out comfortable 4-1 winners.

However, all the talk after the game, especially among the Steyning supporters, what was around the highly controversial sending of the influential centre back, rock Nathan Cooper on the half-hour mark with the scores level at 1-1.Town had taken the lead early on through a well taken goal by Harry Shooman goal racing on to a pass through the middle, holding of a defender, and finishing low in to the net with his right foot . After that Steyning had two or three other good chances to add to it to set up a night of potential cup upset.However, it wasn’t one way traffic in those early exchanges, at the other end, Horsham had missed a very good chance in the first minute and had equalised setting up what looks like to be a cracking match for the rest of the evening. Dan Ajakaiye in particular was asking Steyning’s back four lots of questions with his pacy direct approach.However, the referee had different ideas with what many felt were some pedantic decisions early on which resulted in two yellow cards and ultimately the sending off the unfortunate Cooper who had started the game superbly, already in a great tussle with the strong Shamir Fenelon. Cooper’s first yellow card came in the 15th minute, when Cooper put the ball down to take a free-kick deep in his own half, and then decided at the last minute to hand the freekick over to keeper Lucas, and Cooper jogged on up the pitch.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It’s something you see time and time again in football matches. However, the ref deemed this to be a bookable offence which was extraordinary given the delay was a matter of seconds and it was so early in the game and came with no warning.With Cooper now on an unnecessary yellow, and having his hands full with such lively forwards as those Horsham have, there was a sense of trepidation among the Town faithful that that decision could come back to bite them. And so it proved on the half-hour mark with the second yellow. Steyning also felt the second yellow was questionable as to whether it merited a yellow in isolation.

Steyning and Horsham in semi-final action | Picture: Natalie Mayhew/Butterfly FootballSteyning and Horsham in semi-final action | Picture: Natalie Mayhew/Butterfly Football
Steyning and Horsham in semi-final action | Picture: Natalie Mayhew/Butterfly Football

Cooper committed what would be considered a relatively routine foul in the centre circle. Given the circumstances, most in the ground considered a final warning for Cooper would suffice at that point, and there was there was no clamour from anyone for him to be sent off. However, the ref brandished the second yellow, effectively killing the game for all 854 in the ground who had come to see an exciting tussle.A lot of noise around this decision may sound like sour grapes and Steyning supporters being bitter. However, senior cup semi finals don’t come around too often, and Steyning are always defensive of officials and rarely criticise the decisions they make. However, it’s very hard to support these decisions and accept it.

Whether it’s driven by the ref, the rules, or the pressure there is confusion now every single level of football and every team has its turn to be very frustrated. Whatever the rules and whatever is happening, it’s clearly very wrong.

There is no way, if you take a step back and look objectively, with any level of common sense and objectivity, that Nathan Cooper committed crimes in those first half an hour that should result in him taking no further part in the match.Horsham added a second goal soon after and Steyning were hanging on for half-time where they went in 2-1 down. Time for a reorganisation as Shooman dropped to centre back and Town reverted to four at the back.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The second half really became an exercise in Horsham keeping possession and Steyning camping deep in their own half trying to limit the damage. In fact the damage had been done in the first half! Horsham added two more goals during the second half to give the scoreline fair reflection of the dominance they had in that second period.

Lucas made one cracking save and the Barrowmen did superbly to limit the number of clear cut chances, as the ones they did create were finished ruthlessly. However, Steyning did continue to try to attack on the counter in the second half where possible.

Their one big chance of the second half came early on when Carey in the Horsham goal pulled off a stunning point, blank save from the hard-working Chalaye when he seemed destined to score.Horsham are certainly a fine team and their touch, control and movement was a level above anything Steyning come across normally within their division, which is two levels below the Hornets. However, based on the pattern of play in the first 30 minutes when it was 11 v 11 the optimistic ones felt Steyning were there to give Horsham a good stern test.

Steyning wish Horsham all the best in the final – they have a terrific fan base, a good team and they deserve every success.For but the SCFL premier side it was an evening of great pride, great frustration and a large sense of what could’ve been.They look ahead to a Peter Bentley semi-final and exciting run-in in the league – and that all starts with Horsham YMCA at home on Saturday.Steyning : Szendela-Goetzke, Da Costa, Cooper, Fuller, Clark, Shooman, Edwards, Barnes, Francis, Meehan, Chalaye. Subs used: Goldson, Rance, Oladokun, Remfry, Rondel.